I agree with everything that Matt says in this video, with one slight caveat. The way to get the bitcoin that you want is to vote with your money. That is your power.

If the BTC444 fork starts with just 5% of the mining network, then it can start to get traction. The thing that will make the miners switch, is if the price of the new fork is higher than its relative hash power. For example, if the price of BTC444 is 10% of the old btc price and it has only 5% of the hash, then it is twice as profitable for the miners to mine BTC444 rather than the old one.

Miners are economically incentivesed actors, they will produce what people will pay for.

After the fork everyone will have both versions of bitcoin in their wallet. You can sit tight and play it safe, that way you will certainly end up with the winning bitcoin either way.

Alternatively, you can become an active part of shaping the future of bitcion by selling some of your spam chain bitcion for some clean chain bitcoin. It will be quite cheap at first.

Pay for the bitcoin that want to own and miners will produce what you pay for.

This is how capitalism is supposed to work.

The core devs are attempting a coup, but we have the real power.

If you think about how almost all of the OG bitcoin hodlers really don't like ordinals, then you can probably have a good guess as to who is going to win!

Peter Todd hates bitcoin and he wants to tear it all down.

He made a film in which he pretended to be satoshi.

He persistently proposes that we extend bitcoin beyond the 21m limit.

He is bullying the bitcoin core devs into expanding OP_RETURN. I have been to bitdevs meetings and I've seen it happen.

The only thing that we can do with 100KB that we can't do with 80 bytes is put more non financial data on the blockchain.

The CSAM threat is real. That is what central bankers want, it is what governments want, it is what shitcoin projects want and it is what Peter Todd wants.

They want to see bitcion fall.

Thank you nostr:nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qppamhxue69uhku6n4d4czumt99uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep026j8ly for highlighting this topic for us.

nostr:nevent1qqspssgnjsucku9vwtc3mu0px065mmvmlkc99tnvl8hxm00ta5nhy2gzyzzxxpmg3gy7cyffvl4s2388320g33y02pcjcw0dfy0l9dh6qxdwsqcyqqqqqqguksfgx

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bip 444 in my opinion is needed let’s say the risk of running a tor relay will come to the node runner because of CSAM and or illegal material or the risk be push on to these public miners like Mara f2pool they already have issues from communities

Yes, repost for me please.

eres un genio short

Good

πŸ€”?

Thanks for sharing!

We may only have this one shot to kill fiat...

We must win this war! nostr:note1zxfc76hu6qf07qyyzgxmhpdujy0xgyj2yss8nx4pkzazy0q7jwpqwgtzhc

Cool

πŸ‘€

LOL, good luck with that.

Pathetic

Any your suggestion is to sit there with your feet up and do thing.

πŸ‘Œ

Who do we have who's working on a third implementation?

Core has gone rogue and Luke is pro-covenants, which I'm not.

Is there any third implementation that would simply be conservative? Just keeping bitcoin the way it was before the horror of v30 (and possibly v29) ?

We just need good stewards to be there in cases of dramatic bugs that could mess up the network (and potentially something for quantum down the line).

#core #knots #node #bitcoin #btc

Yes a fork that just puts op return back to 80 would be the most acceptable fork

But I'm also talking about afterwards. I've lost trust in Core. So, even with a soft fork, I feel we need a third implementation going forward. We have to make sure this can't happen again.

πŸ‘

Thank you for the information

AQSTR helps me found this note.

Peace

😎

Yes let’s signal to the government that bitcoin can be changed and indeed destroy its immutability based on legal threats. What could possibly go wrong.

Fucking pussies.

We can't move to a new fork to remove OFAC transactions because bitcioners would never vote for that.

But avoiding CSAM on the blockchain? Yes they will vote for that.

Bitcoiners would never vote to destroy the immutability of the chain

OFAC is government meddling in the financial sovereignty of everyone.

🀘

πŸ€”

If the Bitcoin Core developers lack integrity and can be intimidated or bribed, they should be barred from further involvement with Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Core v30 should be blacklisted and the taproot exploit addressed immediately. You don't hope a cancerous growth with die off and leave the host in good health; you cut it out early or you bombard it with radioactive particles.

I can tell you now that this is not going to work. 4 in Chinese sounds like death. Chinese won’t buy houses with the number 4. BTC444 is not going to be accepted by Chinese people.

πŸ‘

Decentralization will win at the end.

Peace

vote + money = true democracy

Inviolable property = true democracy possible, though still not guaranteed.

Violable property, or imperfect property rights = fake democrscy, at best.

Greetings from the Winners' Club @ SATOSH.EE :)