Avatar
Ankh- Morpok
909b4e2cc5844f0e1b61936393ef79d70fdc2ca2585d1fb908a8178d15091b24
Bitcoin, Terry Pratchett, 🇵🇸

To me, in the last few years, Israel has defined barbarism. Feels like they’ve got a bloodlust they’ll never satisfy. Makes me very uncomfortable.

State violence will always try and steal private property. Palestine is a warning to us all. Learn to protect your property.

GM and a very happy and prosperous 2026 to everyone.

Moderate to left wing bitcoiner replying with GM.

I want to start a thread on what people consider to be true luxury. I’m just interested and might try a few. I’ll start.

1. Doing something physical during the day so you muscles are mildly sore, resting with a couple of glasses of good red wine (Pinot Noir) and the heading into an outdoor Japanese onsen where there is snow falling around you and you are inside the natural hot spring water.

#asknostr

This is a really common situation, and honestly it helps to frame it in a way that makes sense to a teenager’s world, not an adult privacy lecture.

Here’s how you could approach it.

First, start by validating how he feels. If he thinks his mates will take the piss, that matters to him. Dismissing that just makes him dig in.

Something like:

“I get why you don’t want to stand out or get mocked. Nobody likes that.”

Then reframe Proton not as a “privacy thing” but as a control and independence thing. Teenagers respond much better to autonomy than fear.

She could say:

“This isn’t about being paranoid or hiding anything. It’s about having something that’s actually yours, not owned by a massive company that scans and profiles everything you do.”

It helps to explain Google in very plain terms. Not evil, not scary, just practical.

For example:

“Google email is free because you are the product. Your emails help train ads, profiles, and AI systems. That data doesn’t just vanish, it sticks around for years.”

Then bring it back to his future, not abstract privacy. Teenagers care about tomorrow versions of themselves, even if they pretend not to.

You might say:

“Stuff you send at (insert age here) can still exist when you’re 25. Uni applications, jobs, background checks, even account breaches. Proton means less data floating around that you don’t control.”

A really effective angle is to make it optional and low pressure. Not a replacement, just an upgrade.

For example:

“You don’t have to ditch Gmail. Think of Proton like a lockable drawer. Use it for important stuff, school, logins, recovery emails. Keep Gmail for mates if you want.”

This removes the social fear instantly. He is not “the weird kid with a hacker email”, he is just using a better tool quietly.

You can also flip the peer pressure argument. Teens hate being seen as naïve.

Yoy could say, lightly:

“Honestly, people getting laughed at aren’t the ones protecting their accounts. It’s the ones who get hacked, locked out, or have old messages dragged up years later."

No drama, just reality.

If he’s into tech, gaming, or crypto at all, that helps. Proton has real credibility in those spaces. It’s used by developers, journalists, and security researchers, not conspiracy theorists.

If he isn’t, keep it simple:

“It looks like Gmail, works like Gmail, just doesn’t spy on you.”

One last thing that really helps is giving him ownership of the decision.

End with something like:

“I’m not forcing you. I just want you to understand why having at least one private email is a smart move. You decide how and when to use it."

That changes it from a rule into a grown-up choice, and teenagers respond far better to that.

Thanks. I’ll definitely try this.

I’m dealing with this. My teenage son doesn’t see any reason to have a proton email. His friends will think he’s weird. He doesn’t care that Google owns his email.

Am on holiday in Japan. They’ve mercilessly protected their culture but are genuinely friendly to foreigners and seem very interested in our culture. It’s a paradox.

“"But if some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. You will say then, 'Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.' Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.”

Apostle Paul, Romans 11:17-24

Merry Christmas everyone. Here’s a message of peace.

https://youtu.be/jnbDn3ghqbk?si=YDqLmMrNSisdz2GM

“Merry Christmas to all,

and to all a GN” 🎄

Blacks are doing it right. Why the hell are whites and asians funding the government??? Taxation is theft!!

Replying to Avatar Bauzen

🤦‍♂️

I want to Japan a few years ago. It seems like they were about 20 years ahead of the rest of the world in the 90s but it froze there. So now they’re actually behind the rest of the world. I listened to a podcast (can’t remember which) but he was talking about how after Japan’s economic bubble burst in the 90s it’s been government “investment” through 0% interest rates that’s kept the economy ticking along but everyone is just marking time. There’s literally no incentive to innovate, and the economy is dragged along by low interest borrowing to fund zombie companies to keep people in work.

Replying to Avatar Ava

I hear you, and on the theology, we're on the same page.

I still remember the day I ran out to buy a first edition hardback copy of Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas by Elaine Pagels.

And this wonderful quote...

"How can we tell the truth from lies? What is genuine, and thus connects us with one another and with reality, and what is shallow, self-serving, and evil? Anyone who has seen foolishness, sentimentality, delusion, and murderous rage disguised as God’s truth knows that there is no easy answer to the problem that the ancients called discernment of spirits. Orthodoxy tends to distrust our capacity to make such discriminations and insists on making them for us. Given the notorious human capacity for self-deception, we can, to an extent, thank the church for this. Many of us, wishing to be spared hard work, gladly accept what tradition teaches."

Elegant writing. Condescending message! She's critiquing the church for not trusting you to discern truth... while implying most people can't be bothered! Classic.

The teachings in Thomas... the kingdom within, discovering your own divine nature, self-knowledge as the path. This resonates way more with what a Jewish mystical teacher focused on enlightenment would actually have been teaching.

However...

When scholars date ancient texts, they look at when other writers first reference them, manuscript evidence, linguistic patterns, theological development. The earliest mentions of Thomas come from the late 2nd century. The papyrus fragments we have date around 200 CE. The Nag Hammadi manuscript is 4th century.

Could Thomas contain earlier oral traditions? Sure. That's what Pagels argues; the compiled text (90-140 CE) probably includes some early material mixed with later stuff. But we can't date the text earlier than the evidence allows.

On Thomas being Q... some have suggested it, but here's the problem: Thomas shows signs of knowing the synoptic gospels. When it shares sayings with Matthew and Luke, it often reflects their editorial changes. That means the version—at least as we currently have it—came after them, not before.

Ehrman points out that Thomas lacks the apocalyptic urgency that marks the earliest Jesus material. The synoptic gospels present Yeshua preaching that the kingdom is coming soon. Thomas presents the kingdom as already here, within you.

Ehrman sees that as a later theological development, but it could just as easily show that the original mystical teaching got changed into apocalyptic urgency by the early church.

So while I agree... the theology in Thomas is most likely closer to what he actually taught. But the text itself, as we have it, was compiled later.

The tradition is older than the documents.

My favorite line from the Gospel of Thomas (Saying 70):

"If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you."

From deep seek “The "Predator" Feeling Like a Victim: This is the core paradox. Many Israelis, even as they command a powerful military, feel like victims facing annihilation. This mindset makes them willing to support extreme military measures in the name of security.”

Who are the “Crazy crypto-anarchists”? Especially of this cycle?

I’ll start

Max Kieser

Dr Jack Kruse

nostr:nprofile1qqsyx708d0a8d2qt3ku75avjz8vshvlx0v3q97ygpnz0tllzqegxrtgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqy8hwumn8ghj7mn09eehgu3wvdeq6essp3 (he’ll fight anyone)

nostr:nprofile1qqsvn6daczcrcgdaxdap9h84k33af876l6yy4gfth9gvrqhfund7nwqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqj2amnwvaz7tmzw4a85cn0wskhyetvv9ujucn4d3kxjumgvfhh2mn50yhxxmmd0fmzgu 2500