Replying to Avatar j

disclaimer: has has his own money unvested in fedi (a custodial privacy project) this presents a huge conflict of interest for drivechains (since a zero knowledge proof based sidechain (which is already implemented and usable on the drivechains testnet) would make fedi a worthless company
Avatar
ODELL 2y ago

lol that is not why I do not support a drive chain fork

and if you think I don't support as many privacy tools on bitcoin as possible then you have not been paying attention

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
j 2y ago

I have nothing but respect for your work supporting privacy on Bitcoin

If drivechains work, they would be a better solution than anything on the market for many people. A solution with a different set of tradeoffs

Avatar
j 2y ago

Also, to clarify, I have no idea why you don't support drivechains.

I've heard you say "never gonna happen", " shitcoins on bitcoin", and other nonsequitors but I haven't found any reasons yet. Will keep listening