I still use amber for when I need remote signer (bunker) stuff. But I agree with you about the permissions, I was complaining about this 4-5 months ago any no one understood.
Every native Nostr app doesn't understand when I refuse to sign an event. They just continues to ask for a signature until I close the app or give in. It makes them unusable
I think that nsec.app does it, but there should be an agreed upon set of basic + advanced presets for different kinds that will be auto signed. That way it doesn’t flood the user with a bunch of sign requests, because they’ve already preapproved for the given kind it’s asking to sign in whatever group they allowed.
A standard might be nice but why are the apps flooding me with sign requests in the first place?
yes, i think if apps want to continue to use nsecs and relays as their database, they either need to standardize it or use device keys.. amber must be able to parse out the content of an encrypt/decrypt.. and recognize what it is used for in the case of overloading a single key like this.
when i use PGP, the mail app doesn't use my PGP key for storing a last read UI notifications..
😅
ahaha, that's a relay access control issue. the purpose is so that other apps that recognise the data can have the settings without a further complication in syncing the settings. a lot of clients do this, jumble does it, for example. one of the first things i see when i log requests it sends.
This is apos' fault, not Amber"s one.
Using Amber, or any other signer, more will force apps to improve how they manage rejections.
Hopefully, but in the short turn it just means I don't use any other apps :)
