Pay per use is very difficult to manage for tech companies.

When you buy a car for example, you are fine to wait couple of months until its delivered to you. You are fine to wait for guarantee service in queues. You are fine to pay for a lot of things that are not covered by service guarantee.

When netflix doesn’t work for couple of hours you think they are bustards who do nothing but seat on top of gold piles.

I think you understand it well, but most of the (paying) clients don’t

Pay per use is what we should have more. And this is a simple concept. But as usual “its very difficult to make things simple”. So we should work towards finding solutions to make it work

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I mean all of these in one way or another. You are absolutly right in terms of revenue stream. I have a friend which is hairdresser and he is the best case for pay per use from business pov. This month you have 500customers, next you might have 20. What do you do?

But, I will pay one time 20c to have access to a news article for 24h, or for a movie, the same, say $1 or $2.

Or for a nostr service for example to generate me 100 PDFs, or a storage service to store me for a fixed amount of time some files, than to remove them no question asked.

I am not saying to remove subscription. But allow the user to pay par use too.

On digital you have time x resource = price/second (let's say)

You want sorage?

You want, say, compute power for whatever? Same time x (cpu freq + other)

You want a temporay chat?

All of these can be covered with pay per use first. I need more? Yeah, sure, make a sats deposit to the servuce and they will let you know when your credit is done.