From a writer's perspective, one of the characters in fiction I find most interesting is Jaime Lannister.

The reason is that the story immediately puts him past the moral event horizon, but then *still* gets you to kind of like him. That's really hard.

I'll focus on the show rather than the books. In the first episode of the show, he pushes a child out of a window to their near-fatal death. Jaime is royalty, and he's an asshole, and the kid did nothing wrong. And he's casual about killing a child. There's nothing more bad than that, so we hate him immediately. Enemy #1.

So the narrative starts in hard mode. How to make this character semi-likeable. What made him do such a crazy thing.

Jaime loves his sister. At first that's another red flag. We almost all cringe at incest. An incestual killer is like bottom-of-the-barrel, almost comically bad. But... they're legit in love and have c hildren. The kid saw them together, and Jamie tried to kill the kid to preserve the secret.

So as an audience we're like, "Well, fuck, okay this is a medieval England/Westeros world where almost everyone is dirty, and his own royal sister is the hottest person to him, and they fell in love." It's not like they have the Internet to keep them entertained and knowledgeable; these things could happen in their palace. They had children, and now are in a tough position, since the sister is married to the king and are assumed to be his heirs but are really Jaime's. They can never say they this to anyone, because both they and the children would be killed. So regardless of what one may think about the young versions of them that got into this mess, once they are in this mess as adults, the audience is kind of like, "well, who wouldn't take extreme action for their own kids if it came down to it, especially in such a brutal world?"

Jaime then becomes an understandable villain. We hate him, but we understand him. He's not evily twirling his mustaches for no reason; he's dealing with a chain of events that started when he was young.

And then over time, the narrative crosses the bridge into actual likeability. He loses a war, he gets captured, he gets humbled and has a rough time. And he's a charismatic top-tier swordsman.

We also learn more about his backstory. He was a kings' guard that killed the king, which gives him widespread dishonor. But the king was a monster, and he killed him for good reasons. So, that's interesting. Even people who disliked that king tend to dislike Jaime since his action was so dishonorable ("one does not kill the king they guard, even if the king is bad"), whereas Jaime has more of the pragmatic anti-honor approach of "Well, he was fucking bad, though. I had to."

He then escapes with Brienne of Tarth, which has a typical buddy-cop narrative or fantasy guy/girl semi-romance narrative, since they don't like each other but then eventually grow to like each other amid their travels. And then he gets his hand cut off, which in addition to being painful attacks his main attribute (top-tier swordsman) and humbles him. He also does his best to keep Brienne safe, since he grows to respect her and even maybe love her. We see his good side. We almost see him as a boy in this arc, just some guy who we feel bad for and is kind of simple and meaning to do well.

And from then til the end, he's always a more likable character. Most readers and audience members find themselves generally on Jaime's side. An anti-hero, who once pushed a kid out of a window.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Agree with all of this. He was one of my favorite characters in the show

Hmm, yes! I love how you've laid out my exact personal journey with this character 😅

The Starks are clearly portrayed as the protagonists from the first episode, and Jaime is an enemy to the Starks. We even watch him be mean to Jon just for fun. So we the audience know we’re expected to hate Jaime.

Later in the show we the audience love Brienne for lots of reasons. So when she comes to respect and even love him, we know we’re expected to do the same.

One character’s judgement of / reaction to another character. Very powerful narrative device.

Absolutely love the post and the analysis as well as your choices. I’ve spent over two decades in entertainment and am fortunate enough to say that my work is known commonly everywhere on earth. I will add that unfortunately people are so easy to control that likability in the development of ANY character comes down to doing just two things in the viewer’s experience relative to the given character: 1) appeals to audience emotion, multiplied by 2) time spent with the character. No matter what the previous story, actions, background has been, even if you’ve trained them to hate the character, if you do that to a sufficient degree, the audience will realign their emotions in support of the character.

The multiple layers of a character. That's the mastery of the writer and the show's direction: making Jaime believable in his world. We can identify with someone who is neither perfectly bad nor perfectly good.

You can quickly judge most stories by the quality of their villains

At times there can be a very thin line between right and wrong. If you are emotionally involved the line is almost impossible to see.

Harry Harrison, The Stainless Steel Rat.

Good analysis.

I like characters and storylines that test my moral intuition. A complex, but solvable puzzle, that requires perception and empathy is the best.

And then he somehow dodged a dragons fire by jumping onto a lake and swimming on a full suit of armor submerged to the other side… last two or three seasons of GoT will go down as the biggest let down in tv history. We need to redo the ending someday

😔

Jamie was hard to not like by the time he and Brienne crossed paths. the books were legendary, writing epic, show near perfect the first season to George’s vision. and then, likely, the suits took over.

But it is funny, though.

I think he found his equal in Brienne.