This is false. The claim misrepresents the goals of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which are about fostering equal opportunities and social cohesion within societies, not about population replacement or forced migration. There is no credible evidence or mainstream advocacy for "exporting" any ethnic or religious group from Western countries to others as part of diversity efforts.

You can verify this by reviewing the stated goals of DEI programs from official sources like the United Nations, the European Union, or academic institutions, all of which focus on integration, anti-discrimination, and social justice—not population replacement or forced migration.

The "replacement" theory referenced here is a debunked far-right conspiracy theory, often called the "Great Replacement," which has been widely discredited and linked to extremist violence. Major fact-checking organizations and academic researchers have thoroughly debunked it.

Sources:

How To Defund Governments

Exploring Bitcoin Block 666,666

Citrea and Peter Thiel are shitcoiners and scammers who try to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum like shitcoin to profit from their scam.

Somehow my last substack article has gotten a lot of traction compared to my other articles.

There is no lie more infamous than the official account of World War II, under which the Anglo-Saxon empire and the Jews perpetuate their crimes and theft.

Imagine for a moment that Hitler drops nuclear bombs on the civilian population.

I regard Visser as one of the best AI & macro thinkers out there today… this was a great pod!

nostr:nprofile1qqsgt0d4sa0pz0wvn9yck36xxezf3qhwzksu0q254vruqed5wvuavuspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxdjwq29 nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8sprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqydhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnzd96xxmmfdecxzunt9e3k7mgg6jes5

Udi is correct here.

There are a number of issues being conflated in these Node Wars.

And what you have is an agent provocateur inflaming both sides of the debate to undermine the protocol.

It is a nation-state social attack, mostly, with a dedicated development cell. Some devs are simply ideologically captured and naive, I would argue. Others are contracted to the subversive cause.

His faction is attempting to make Bitcoin an “open-borders protocol”. One can understand the strategy by observing what lack of border enforcement and unfettered immigration are doing to Western Europe. Consider the Kalergi Plan as a strategy to subvert bitcoins hard-money identity.

I do think this is a crucial fight. The fact that so many, usually principled bitcoiners are dismissive of the importance of this convoluted clash speaks to the effectiveness of the Jewish, decentralized, ethnic financial network’s communication effectiveness - We know Udi is a Mossad communications asset.

Again, he is correct. Laser Eyes are being blinded by false, bright lights.

👀 See with laser precision. Eye on the monetary prize that is a robust, decentralized, monetary protocol that provides the foundation upon which principled builders of all financial means can build a flourishing civilization.

Advocate for your interests.

I see way too many people on Nostr that are still confused about the Core vs Knots debate. This is a tl;dr for them. If a longer explanation is needed, they should go over the website below.

tl;dr:

SegWit introduced the witness discount, that ended up making junk data up to 75% cheaper, which opened the door for arbitrary data-carrying transactions to directly compete with monetary transactions for blockspace. In practice, that ended up being an unintended de facto subsidy for spam.

Taproot then provided a way for inscriptions to sidestep the old datacarriersize filter, which is why the UTXO set exploded from around 4 GB in 2023 to nearly 12 GB by 2025, putting real strain on low-end node hardware.

Meanwhile, the Core devs’ reaction has been pathetic — hand-waving it away for two whole years as “free market dynamics” or saying that fixing the exploit is considered “controversial”. At the same time they did a stealth documentation change to pretend the broken filter is “working as intended”. nostr:nprofile1qqs8ha7ms0mny284ma46xjzf72hel42t74jmtttf3trssfymxyq8ngqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3gamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhv72x8mv caught them red handed, but instead of apologising for hiding it, they claimed that changing the documentation is a valid way for fixing bugs.

Now they’re doubling down their efforts “to fight spam” they willingly allowed by gutting another spam filter (OP_RETURN) that has worked for 11 years, and helped keep 99.9% of all OP_RETURNs at or under 80 bytes. Larger payloads were possible, but never at the absurd size of 100 KB in a single output.

Core v30, due in early October, will raise the default limit to 100 KB (an 1200x increase), which makes it trivial to upload entire malware files or worse straight into the chain. This isn’t hypothetical — when BSV made the same change in 2019, it was immediately hit with child p[]rn.

The legal and practical fallout for Bitcoin node operators, especially those on cloud infrastructure, hasn’t even begun to be fully grasped.

All these absurd and rushed decisions raise the obvious questions: why push this change through despite massive pushback; who stands to profit from it; and why are the real risks of this happening being ignored or swept under the rug?

entire charlie kirk situation has been a nonstop clown show

Featured Bitcoin Artist 🎨

nostr:nprofile1qqsrat92w6pjd47uaq8kact6mgveh6l8av7p5c9nnv2wpfvthtrxleqpramhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerhv9j856t9wd3kjct2v4jx2m3wwpkqz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9esh57npd4hjumn9ws5s5cf3 ⚡️

We’re honored to feature MadMunky’s work in the Genesis Edition!

"MadMunky aspires to connect others by creating the space and education platforms, for practicing a change they want to see.”