Is there literally ANY wording in the SBR proposal that attacks p2p movement? Or are we just FUDing as usual because an entity is using bitcoin in a way we don’t like?
These guys are like “is this what bitcoiners have become? NGU at any cost?”
By that theory, you shouldn’t give af what laws get put into place. I thought you were a Cypherpunk. Don’t pay attention to the (non existing yet) laws then.
Literally lol
People have been saying for years that the game theory would lead to government adoption, and now that’s bad, apparently.
Yeah, just don’t comply. They won’t be able to afford enforcement. The beauty of NGU.
Please Login to reply.
Once the theft pillar is down, it’s game over.
What breaks the left pillar?
Breaking the right pillar. Can’t have one without the other.
Followed. 🫡