I’m in for 50K sats to get this prioritized.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Always appreciate a bounty as an incentive and signal to the devs how important an issue is.

For context we have had 6 and 7 digit sats bounties open for over half a year.

I’m not bankrolled like that. I guess just keep it in the mix until it can be done, but it’s a core part of the UX and I think not should be a priority fix.

Just setting your expectations. Not asking for anything. Appreciate your continuous feedback 🤝

Why is no one claiming them or contributing?? I’d like to look at what i can do -

*bug

#bigfixes

yuh. maybe jack will do it.

I still think q is cleaner. When using e tags and markers clients are forced to pull down quotes when pulling the thread, which is a waste of bandwidth.

But yes we can filter them out using markers, but clients should be doing the right thing here and not wasting peoples bandwidth by using q tags

Oh, I never thought of it that way. That’s a good point. Has anyone proposed this as an amendment to NIP-18?

Yeah it will be pretty important for popular posts. No i don’t think it has been proposed yet.

I was already in the middle of cleaning up the language in that NIP and others that relate to event mentioning and referencing. I’ll take a stab at it.