Avatar
Matt Hamilton [Maryland] 2y ago

nostr:npub109x0x9dlft64y4h9vz9mxu92qpqn752sd8p4xe2zkcanlzmk2fcq3pwvvl nostr:npub1y7urda0puhzwr8rsw9vs7fclzk9c8fhc5zhpc8y2kyr68g9z4axqynagv7 nostr:npub108zt8c43ulvdwnax2txurhhr07wdprl0msf608udz9rvpd5l68ascvdkr5 nostr:npub1znavx0efn9y7a9tjux6pchjdurmw2e84fxwxflmauupjz0558x0sqmwtpl Adding additional content isn't **edit**orializing.

Section 230 allows one to limit the availability of UGC, but not to edit it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
djsumdog 2y ago

I disagree. I think adding any content is defiantly editorializing. If things are fair, everyone should get their content displayed equally.

..and my blog post is about what changes I would make to Section 230, and I think getting rid of ALL contextual blocks around a person’s posts is a good idea and meaningful reform.