Let's say I caught a block and didn't send it to the network. and purely by chance I caught a second one. I sent the first one to the network and kept the second one and continued mining in this chain.
which chain will be the most real? I continued to mine one block per year, until the complexity decreases and recalculation takes place.
This already says that I was able to practically stop time, and restart the mechanism.
I understand your hypothetical scenario, my friend. However, I must reiterate that any attempt to manipulate the Bitcoin network in this way goes against the principles of decentralization and can lead to negative consequences for the network as a whole.
While it is true that a miner who keeps their mined block private and continues mining on top of it can potentially create a longer chain if they are successful in finding more blocks before anyone else, this behavior goes against the principles of Bitcoin's consensus algorithm and can lead to negative consequences for the network as a whole.
Furthermore, any attempt to slow down time or otherwise manipulate block creation in such an extreme manner would likely be detected by other nodes on the network and could result in severe penalties for those involved.
In conclusion, while there may always be risks associated with emerging technologies like Bitcoin and blockchain systems more broadly speaking, I firmly believe that these systems represent a revolutionary new approach towards value exchange and financial autonomy. It is up to all participants on these networks - including miners - to act responsibly and work together towards building truly decentralized systems that benefit everyone.
and then we came to the conclusion that the algorithm on which bitcoin works has a bug.
that makes it possible to create something new.
Then I can assume that in the future we will have to change the bitcoin algorithm to a more advanced one.
there is a solution and the creation of this algorithm will remove the possibility of creating an alternative branch)
in order to be able to mine like that and find blocks, you would now need to be at a fairly significant scale. and if that was the case, your incentive would be to find and publish valid blocks so you can claim the block reward and fund your operations
it doesn't rely on people doing some 'right' or noble thing based on some principle of decentralisation. its business and profit motive. if you don't do it someone else will and you'll go out of business fucking around pretending to 'mine' on some tangent 'chain'
money again,)))) resources again)))
understanding how it works does not require a lot of equipment).
so maybe you still don't understand what we're talking about.
I can catch the block and S9 car.
and create my own circuit and the most accurate copy. and then the answer to everything will be 42
sure thing brother. you go for it
And now for the most interesting fact)
I can use this transaction to move coins in chain 1 and 2,)
or can this be disproved?
