I think something similar has also been brought up by nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq3svyhng9ld8sv44950j957j9vchdktj7cxumsep9mvvjthc2pjuqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqypwdvafq3rtjgg4ndkmsktec94sr2r3tzf55h96uqyn0klgl6ugcsuzvgrh

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah right, thanks for that. He clearly gets it.

Honestly if I was an at-risk person the last network I'd promote my base to use would be Nostr. I wouldn't trust my base to be able to steer clear of honeypot relays and expose all sorts of things.

As for privacy policy and terms, to a degree that's helpful—but any honeypot relay would also have honeypot terms.

That too. And in this regard, it's also easier to hold one CEO of a central platform accountable than many, often anonymous relay operators.