Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Chris Liss

Too much time evaluating low-probability leads.

If you were the only one with AI, it would give you an advantage, but once everyone has it, you have no advantage, and it’s a hassle for everyone.

Kind of like when some NBA team figured out three point shots were more efficient than two-point jump shots, got an edge. Then everyone copied it, the whole league is just chucking from deep, the game is way worse, and no one gets any advantage because they’re all doing it.

Not saying it will go down like this, but there are some innovations that are great individually, but net negative collectively.

Avatar
Rod 11mo ago

It's a brain teaser all right.

I think it leads to a more efficient market, and increased efficiency is a net positive. (Maybe?)

But it also probably means eroding margin for everything. (Or, worse, all margin accrues to the AI companies)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
HoloKat 11mo ago

More efficiency everyone wins in the long term. Until that matures someone will be better off than others

Thread collapsed