It's just intellectual empty calories. Like, I get why it appeals to some people. But it's detached from anything resembling a robust empirical understanding of human nature. Basally, it just takes its own narrow understanding of human nature for granted, even though it's obviously wrong, plants the axioms and then builds a story from there.
Discussion
I don't apologize for sounding snobbish or elitist, either. Sometimes you just have to say what you believe.