signal的早起用户 界面简洁美观 阅读感很强
应该没记错的话 是公益项目
目前在加密通讯上还算是靠谱 但是公益项目 不一定会做到极致 但对于大部分人够用了 毕竟网络的世界很难做到决对的隐私 牺牲部分隐私获取网络的信息 这是公认的
现在原signal的团队已经开发了新的通讯软件
但是和signal一样是闭源的 闭源相比开源 大部分人愿意接受开源 现在的混合加密算法很多 基本够用 包括threema 也是闭源。开源的现在接触 unplugged messages… 就看未来谁家的技术和第三方担保能做到顶级的公正……
不是，signal 一直是开源的，前身是文字通讯工具TextSecure和语音通讯工具RedPhone，从2009年开始做的。
现在是基金会模式，团队应该没怎么变。
WhatsApp 和Facebook messenger 也用了signal 协议实现的端对端加密。
对的 是开源的 记错了 但是会查看元数据… 不过加密算法是被业界认可的… 读这个⬇️
Unplugged and Signal are both messaging apps that use end-to-end encryption to protect user's messages, and both apps use the Signal Protocol for encryption, which is considered to be one of the most secure encryption protocols available. Both apps also include additional security features such as two-factor authentication and are open-source, which means that the code can be independently audited by security experts.
While both apps are considered to be very secure, there are a few differences between the two:
Signal is a non-profit organization, which means that it does not have the same profit incentives as Unplugged and is less likely to make changes that could compromise user security. Signal is an older and more established messaging app, which means that it has been audited and reviewed by security experts for a longer period of time than Unplugged. Unplugged doesn't collect metadata and does not have access to users' contact lists, while Signal may have access to some metadata but they claim they do not collect or keep it. Overall, both Unplugged and Signal are considered to be very secure and privacy-focused messaging apps, but Signal has more reviews, audits and is a non-profit company.
what'sup和messger 的丑闻一堆
很轻易能被读取数据
