nostr:npub12k72r0e8mq8vwqnlpw79k4f0pm66qvjwneelanplcjhdxhmpla3s9ltvsy If that is the case moving forward then those resources are either going to be controlled by the US, Russia or China. It looks like the US is loosing, not just in Africa, but Ukraine, Syria, Saudi Arabia...
nostr:npub106n0pzzm6jk9mfh3xvlhh53qn7kjz8ja4f8h8r3n6ap706wvtahqltvfwa i think it's worth looking at China's experience in Africa here. A lack of experience with proper colonialism has been very expensive for powers that weren't traditionally colonial (Russia's conquest of Siberia notwithstanding.)
It's not a simply change of flags on the board. There are countries and companies with mineral leases and investments that are quite capable of backing the opposition in severe ways.
nostr:npub12k72r0e8mq8vwqnlpw79k4f0pm66qvjwneelanplcjhdxhmpla3s9ltvsy Indeed. East Congo being one of them and notably not in play in the current upset. East Congo, with its 100 Trillion in natural resources is locked down completely with Clinton, Julian Bond and other's shoreline estates in Rwanda to watch over the proceedings
