Replying to Avatar less

I'm not trying to be a jerk... I just want to get to the heart of the issue.

If Bitcoiners and Bitcoin companies persistently don't want to spend much (if any) of their bitcoin to help pay for large conferences--but crypto companies generally do--maybe there is a lesson to learned.

What is the value-for-value proposition?

I think that Bitcoiners and Bitcoin companies are probably better served by supporting new and improved Bitcoin infrastructure... as a genuine (and better) alternative to the existing fiat-based monetary and financial system.

Meanwhile, since proof of stake (PoS) crypto is simply an extension of the existing PoS fiat system, it is likely best served by marketing to the largest players, politicians, and honeypots within the existing fiat system.

Comments?
Avatar
Linzzz 7mo ago 💬 1

I was at the 2023 conference in Miami... I have to say that while I enjoyed the experience, as far as value goes, I'd rather see more money going to Devs and virtual conferences - leave networking to local meetups and orange pill app. More user friendly UX and more utility is key in the long run, and a virtual conference has all of the information and none of the scam-party vibe at a much lower cost.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Cardinal 7mo ago

I was there too. Probably the last conference with a decent serious people to reckless people ratio.