Replying to Avatar mister--wizard

I think it's called the prayer of st francis of assisi that goes something like "grant me the ability to change those things i can, to endure those things i cant, and the wisdom to know the difference between the two."

if you're a survivor, you'll notice what works, e.g., how to cheer yourself up and not let stuff you can't control get you down, but as others have written, some stuff just has to be endured.

i don't know about you, but i want to strong enough not to be defeated by my own sadness, for my own sake and also so i can continue to be a support for those who rely on me, but i also dont want to become numb, cold, or uncaring.

so i would feel good about yourself if you're sensitive enough to care but have the practical survivor instinct that keeps you from caring so much it becomes dangerous. it may be a little like distance (maai in japanese) in martial arts: there's sort of a natural safe or comfortable distance: too close and you cant move fast enough to defend yourself; too far and you cant engage without overextending.

for me it is not pain but meaningless pain that is hardest to bear. if someone has hurt me (not that they necessarily have deliberately hurt me) but i can do a good thing for them and for myself by enduring it (and i have it in me to bear it!), then sometimes i think to myself "i dont care how bad it hurts, let the pain come if it's going to".

i mean, of course i am not deliberately trying to make things more painful than they are; rather, the idea is that i want to remove the grip that pain has on me and not let it manipulate me (at least to the extent that i am brave enough to pull this off!).

there's a fourway thing that the buddha said that goes sthg like:

"just because a thing is painful does not mean it is unwholesome;

just because a thing is painful does not mean it is wholesome;

just because a thing is pleasant does not mean it is wholesome;

just because a thing is pleasant does not mean it is unwholesome,"

even though we cant always control whether we are happy or sad now, it is a mistake to feel helpless, because whether we will be happy or sad in the future depends on what we do now.

it may not be easy to see how this happens, but even just believing that it happens for a reason and trying to figure out how it all works is itself a wholesome and healthy action that will be a cause of future wisdom and happiness.

lately i've been listening to this monk. i apologize in advance if you dont share my interest in religious-sounding things, as i know anything that sounds even faintly religious can trigger some people. i try not to be biased either for or against but just try to understand and use what's helpful.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l01syReXGis

Thank you for the support!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

thank you for thanking me! and for not misunderstanding ... and also for the sats if those came from you!

not sure if that video was the most relevant or easily understandable. if i come across one that's more relevant and you don't mind, i can try to remember to send it along.

how goes it? i noted with interest your posts from el salvador (el zonte?)

especially the video of the waves washing onto the shore was relaxing and peaceful. i hope you're enjoying your time there.

here's another video from that monk i mentioned i've been listening to.

here he's talking about the anapanasati sutta (the Buddha's instructions on breath meditation and _sati_, usually translated as _mindfulness_ but which i like to think of less politically correctly and therefore more clearly and plainly, as meaning how to cultivate sanity, i.e., nonconfusion.

one minor thing i think -- if i may presume to say so -- that ven chandima may be remembering incorrectly is that whereas i think he says in the video that of

first 4 of 16 steps, i.e., what we call the first tetrad (body tetrad: other 3 are feelings, mind, and mental phenomena) when the 16 steps are organized into 4 sets of 4 instructions, all 4 steps of the first tetrad end in pali (thus, begin in english) with _pajanati_ ("one knows that...") rather than _sikhati_ ("one trains oneself to..."), i think it is actually only the first two steps (breathing in/out long..., breathing in/out short...) that end in pajanati, which means that it is only the first two steps in which we just try to watch passively (though as another sri lankan monk -- ven henepola gunaratana -- has pointed out, even this is actually a sort of participatory observation; i.e., we cant ignore the dact that, even in the 1st two steps, as we watch the breath we are affecting it...and the point in the first tetrad, as made clear in the instructions at the next 2 steps, is that we figure out in the midst of this participating and observing how to skillfully relax and calm the bodily activities, i.e., breathing).

(sorry to be overly detailed. i have probably been studying/practicing this sutta for sthg like 30 years! let me know if you want good pdf which shows pali with literal english translation in case you are into language and like me want to learn it in language it was spoken in by the Buddha so as to minimize any possible distortion of meaning. it is respect for the Buddha, not disrespect for Ven Chandima, that makes me point out slight issue above about which steps end in pajanati vs sikkhati.)

but ven chandima explains this sutta quite well! far better than i can!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SDJhZyrDqvE