Don't worry, I always assume everyone disagrees with me.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I was never worried

I agree with you on this one ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’œ nature abhors a vacuum ๐Ÿ’ฏ As a woman, I like my current safety and ability to roam as I wish under the safety of governing bodies. Do they need to be kept in check too? Yes. If they were completely abolished, then I likely would be too.

Without government freedom of movement would effectively disappear, for most women and children, or other vulnerable groups.

Also, the freedom to choose a mate or leave an abusive relationship. Although, I suspect some would consider that a feature. ๐Ÿ˜ I don't.

Youโ€™re irreparably wrong about this.

About anarchy?

About assuming everyone disagrees with you. It was a joke but it didnโ€™t land ๐Ÿ˜…

Oh. I assumed you also disagreed with me and merely responded to the wrong post. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Didnโ€™t even read the OP, just saw that note without context and couldnโ€™t help myself ๐Ÿ˜…

I should be more specific. I assume that people who respond will disagree with me because the others just hit the "like" and keep scrolling.

I'm not the sort of woman who attracts enthusiastic agreement. I have a lot of talents, but I'm completely missing that one. I tend to attract enthusiastic disagreement.

It is, what it is.