In case their was any confusion. I meant nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl's opinion was shortsighted and naive. 👍
Discussion
Don't worry, I always assume everyone disagrees with me.
I agree with you on this one 🫂💜 nature abhors a vacuum 💯 As a woman, I like my current safety and ability to roam as I wish under the safety of governing bodies. Do they need to be kept in check too? Yes. If they were completely abolished, then I likely would be too.
Without government freedom of movement would effectively disappear, for most women and children, or other vulnerable groups.
Also, the freedom to choose a mate or leave an abusive relationship. Although, I suspect some would consider that a feature. 😏 I don't.
You’re irreparably wrong about this.
About anarchy?
About assuming everyone disagrees with you. It was a joke but it didn’t land 😅
Oh. I assumed you also disagreed with me and merely responded to the wrong post. 😂
Didn’t even read the OP, just saw that note without context and couldn’t help myself 😅
I should be more specific. I assume that people who respond will disagree with me because the others just hit the "like" and keep scrolling.
I'm not the sort of woman who attracts enthusiastic agreement. I have a lot of talents, but I'm completely missing that one. I tend to attract enthusiastic disagreement.
It is, what it is.