I thought one of Jack Maller's strongest counters to Peter, in their debate, was when he argued that something being "digital" doesn't make it less valuable than something "physical."

A phone does have value based on its physical properties and what it does, but the true value of a personal phone lies in the digital data it holds—such as the hundreds or thousands of photos and videos that capture moments from our lives.

Saying Bitcoin has no value because it’s digital is essentially the same as arguing that digital photos of your child's birth have no value simply because they aren’t physical.

It's too bad Peter can't wrap his head around it, or just pretends not to.