No offense taken whatsoever 🤝
Assume you do not live in Cambodia.
Discussion
I knew that's what you meant...I was making the somewhat facetious point that the initial assumption of where I live determines whether their jurisdiction "exists in my life."
It's that presupposition thing again. None of us are neutral.
I think you're missing the original point about "active denial" vs "irrelevance".
You don't actively deny every jurisdiction that doesn't apply to you, not to mention the infinite number of nonexistent jurisdictions that you could _imagine_ and don't even purport reign anywhere. They are more like "irrelevant" or "N/A". Supporting a distant (or imaginary) jurisdiction is an active choice, simply not thinking about them is as close to neutral state of nature as you can get.
Did you think about an elephant while reading that paragraph? If not, were you "denying the elephant"?
Bro...if the elephant were _actually there_, then yes--I would have been ignoring and "denying" the elephant if I wasn't thinking of it. And certainly, if there was an elephant, it would be extremely relevant--don't you think? (And if there was an elephant, wouldn't you think me a little odd for having ignored something so obvious?)
Again: presuppositions. I gotta run. ✌️