Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Peter K

No, I get that. What I mean is, because it's got no context it's a whole lot less useful than it could be. Here's what this message looks like on Iris:

vs. Primal:

In this case, the context isn't so dependent, but when all the messages are "GM", I don't know if it's one of the people I follow posting "GM" and I might want to respond, or if it's people I follow responding to other people's GM posts who I don't follow, and I can/will ignore it. And maybe I look at 5 of them and they're one way, but there's one in the middle that's different.

I actually think the Iris version is too verbose/takes up too much real estate most of the time. But a simple "Replying to PeterK" in there somewhere would give me context I need to know if I want to investigate further.

Avatar
Captain Fantastic 2y ago

I see what you are saying now. I haven't used Iris in a while. That would be annoying/confusing. Maybe that's why I don't use Iris.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Peter K 2y ago

I'm actually saying the Iris view is perhaps cluttered, but better than the Primal one, especially when the message is short/context-free.

Or maybe the right answer is a "Posts" and "Posts and Replies" switch somewhere, similar to what Iris has. I don't know.

Thread collapsed