Agreed

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is literally him saying “uuuhhh I disagree”

Right. Ah he got a one word sentence, because it’s all it deserved.

You, yourself, said…. And I quote

There was a lack of real engagement to my comments. “Uhhh I disagree” doesn’t count.

Right. And my thread before your “uhhh I disagree” was long and well thought out.

Your disagreement was a lot of words that didn’t refute anything, just “I don’t see it.”

K. Cool story bro.

Uh, no, it wasn’t.

K

Thank you.

We are now talking about him saying “bad take” to someone’s argument and you defending that as some sort of discourse.

I am saying that saying “bad take” does not refute the original argument in any way.

He doesn’t need to expound. Bad take is sufficient here. It’s a bad take.

I’m able to extrapolate why this is a bad take; and I agree.

We don’t always have to write lengthy prose to get our points across.

“Brevity is the soul of wit.”

Bad take

K

You don’t have a point at all. You have no argument for how zaps are different from social credit. Your one attempt was an assertion that some people on a completely different social network have done work that deserves pay, and you didn’t even have a single example of that.

You people are literally going to usher in a dystopia and you don’t even care because all that matters to you is your crypto gambling addiction.

You’re argument is simply not worth more than a sentence. Even that is too much.

You have nothing. Keep coping, retards.

K

Feel free to spare us your sentences and your presumed superiority. Reading your sentences is actually a waste of time.

I will.

Shame too. Yesterday it seems as if you had something positive and useful to add to the conversation.

I still do