You’re right. So there would be sats that have no origin (from Robosats) and sats that can be traced (like nokyc from Bisq). If the government wanted to start enforcing kyc only, wouldnt they check both of those since theyre different from kyc sats ?
Discussion
I'm totally in agreement with you that I can be wrong about this - but LN is a layer of protection that is at no trade-off cost to you unless you need larger amounts than offered.
All I’m wondering is do you think it’s safe to do robosat->WoS or Phoenix and then to signing device or do I have to run an ln node to do Robosats to ln node then close channel when the amount is a big enough utxo to then send to signing device ?
Running your own shit is always better fren.
Don't let better get in your way of leaving kyc exchanges -p
Oh I’m just asking questions about it. I guess already something like Phoenix is much better and flexible than a kyc option like WoS. Running an ln node is…something 😂
I remember when the ordinoooools clogged up the mempool. That was painful