Replying to Avatar Sourcenode

nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kytc79p4zh

I am incredibly excited about this rollout and it's a huge win for Bitcoin, but this is ridiculous. At least call them bits instead of bitcoin if you want your power trip.

I don't know a single person (bitcoiner or normie) who isn't confused by calling sats bitcoins.

nostr:nevent1qqsf20jcxnk666c8wnkjpmd893h24ulfka9gtlhmr4r208j6ddgesqcpzdmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c30qgswum4p82uluhz2dr40nvdrflspffntgqghc58w9fs57nx6jkdkuaqrqsqqqqqp8g74r8

Avatar
rejon 1mo ago

Yeah, one fix would be move the B to the end and add "Bits"

Bits is better than Sats.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
The Daniel đź–– 1mo ago

Dear lord, not the bits argument again. We don’t need another unit. Just bitcoins and satoshis. That’s it. We have to stop over-complicating things.

Avatar
rejon 1mo ago

:) marketing is a science

Avatar
The Daniel đź–– 1mo ago

Bits already exist as a unit of measure for data. We can’t and shouldn’t use it.

Avatar
rejon 1mo ago

Sats and lightning are DOA brands

Avatar
Derek Ross 1mo ago

Agree there. Bits makes more sense than anything else.