Lens flare and underexposure at it's best

nostr:nevent1qqswj698m56zuzjw8mdc8a7p6hkdd38xl2p5f0ul2p6e76jkeg6nufcprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj730qgszd44fgen4ucpl3hjt7muuaazzqdahp3lwu9c07phdweelcdxf3ugrqsqqqqqpmpsj9h

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Idk what any of that means lol

Exactly what I was thinking πŸ˜…

Because people are visual I'll give a demonstration.

nostr:nevent1qqswks9dsnyg89nyayjvjs4aakr6c7krcapf8kvewn9yz769uwe49pgpzdmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c30qgs0p7e36xqs48u4mu730r7dvl9qkzv8ntg3ap5fu45k9nvrn7uw44qrqsqqqqqpddk4wy

In most situations when you underexpose an image it blows it all the white and you lose details in important places. Things begin to feel cartoony.

Most people including beginnings photographers would shoot looking for the skin tone 18% gray blowing out the whites but leaving rich blacks as sort of a middleground and that typically works in most applications. But for a wedding photo it's actually kind of better to make everyone look dreamy like that.

It could've been this🀷🏽 but notice how now it looks like her best friend took it with her cell phone🀷🏽

Like I said. Certain situations. Certain feels.

What a trip! The darker one is so weird lol

Exactly

Here I was thinking it was a good photo because of me πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Well you make it easy. But the photographer knew what they were doing.

It means the photographer knew what they were doing 🀷🏽

In most other situations this kind of lighting in the image is really damn annoying and reduces details and color quality.

But when you're trying to make things look ideallic and dreamy. πŸ‘ŒπŸ½πŸ‘ŒπŸ½

Oooooo. Cool lol. She’s was supposed to be good haha