Bitcoin as money is a pipe dream. Five minutes of research would reveal that "fungibility" is an essential prerequisite for money.
Gold is fungible.
Cash is fungible by decree.
Monero is fungible through encryption.
Bitcoin is transparent which means through attached outside metadata it becomes social credit.
Fiat bank accounts and CBDC are both (social) credit systems.
Some genius can use Bitcoin in a fungible way that doesn't make the whole system fungible.
Journalists wanting something, ignoring hard facts when pointed out are activists. We have too much of those wannabe journalists running around.
Stick to the facts. Point out observations and investigative research. For wanting a better world I don't need journalists.
I actually agree with a lot of what you said
What now
Define who you are. I see more value in your work as an impartial journaliat over an activist.
But you are the one to decide and I am the one to judge the value of your contribution for me.
I wouldn't care if you decide on a case by case basis if you act as a journalist and apply certain standards while at other times you really feel passionate for one thing over another as an activist.
But I'd like to see the self-reflection. Because without it it will just muddy waters and neither serve your role as journalist nor as activist.
