https://youtu.be/w--5Qc7vmpg?si=NGXreanRv50BWdBO

19:30

"3 weeks after 9/11, only 220 bodies had been identified, with no trace of the thousands still reported missing. The immense destructive force unleashed by the collapse of the twin towers had literally blown apart most of the people left inside. Some had simply been vaporized in the explosions."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

14:00 "The deeper they went, the more preserved everything was. 100 feet down they found an eerie world of shopping malls and car parks that in places were virtually untouched"

Seems to dispel the underground nuke theory (in case the lack of radiation or visible explosion didn't do that already)

Whats you take on thermite? Im not really attached to any of these, i generally think it was blowback that was allowed to happen as far as the towers go, 7 and the pentagon I think were total inside jobs. Though, the way the buildings collapsed I have always been skeptical that planes did that, too many loose ends.

I don't know of any better explanation than thermate (related to thermite, also has sulfur to lower melting point of steel/iron).

7 is a smoking gun, but restricting focus to 1&2 I think the smoking gun is molten steel

Responders & structural engineers reported molten steel in the rubble

https://youtu.be/fs_ogSbQFbM?si=r2TfuT70Otk_DW1b

Molten steel fused with concrete was recovered from the rubble; it's rusted brown so it's almost certainly iron/steel, not aluminum or lead

(21:20)

https://youtu.be/bObrsLtlmrY?si=ILROSGmnRPTEUVrm

Jet fuel can't melt steel, as the fire engineer at 37:30 will tell you, and any weakening in steel occurs very gradually.

https://youtu.be/DgwlFY-4Txc?si=DdZcFQYD0Dm9btGh

The official pancake theory as detailed in that last link can't explain the molten steel, and IMO doesn't explain the sudden collapse of the whole structure.