This is what Maxwell had to say in full context. The point he is making is that you don't want to incentive alternative relay networks. Nodes, core or knots or otherwise, will still validate and relay valid blocks with valid transactions in them. But it hurts decentralization if you're validating mined blocks that have lots of txns that were never in your mempool.

Big miners can profit more from these alternative txn relay networks and if you push profitable use cases to these alternatives simply because the public default relay network is too restrictive, then that is far more harmful than the alternative.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah, I read his post. If Bitcoin mining companies have to result to accepting bribes from spammers, then that’s a terrible business model because eventually scamming trends end and others begin. They’ll be driven out, reputation damned, and then mining hardware will be sold to cover bankruptcy costs. The way I see it, more home mining will eventually take over.

How would they be driven out if it is economically more profitable and viable?

Scams die out so it doesn’t STAY profitable. Look at NFTs on ETH; scams couldn’t even last on a scamchain.

For sure. I don't like NFTs as much as the next person, but this isn't really about NFTs. You don't design network protocols based on market sentiment. As we all know, markets will stay irrational for longer than you can stay solvent.