Subnostr

utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 1y ago

I'm married to Bitcoin, but not to lightning

If we find a better way, I'm here for it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Kenshin 🥷 1y ago

In terms of non custodial? Probably right...

Because custodial services are already very good, like Strike.

crany 👽🧡🗿 1y ago

yes, LN via custodial services is working and maturing. self custodial is not easy and needs AI to mange channels automatically imho. multiple L2 innovations ans options for quick peer to peer settlements are encouraged

Kenshin 🥷 1y ago

What about Liquid? Seems a bit easier to get going but it is more centralised than lightning...

utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 1y ago

Trying to scale on Blockchain with another Blockchain isn't an elegant engineering solution, it's also not a layer because you can't trustlessly settle back on chain

Complete non starter imo

Kenshin 🥷 1y ago

Hmm thanks for the input, I need to understand better how liquid works... It seemed compelling at some point when I heard of ways to move from lightning to liquid and then stack in a hardware wallet in order to increase privacy.

utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 1y ago

Enjoy the journey fren

ObjectiF MooN⚡️₿ 1y ago

Why not lightning ?

utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 1y ago

It's good but it's not perfect the way Bitcoin is

Ken Lazer 1y ago

If it was perfect than lighting would not have been created. There are enhancements to BTC that a layer 2 can provide.

JordyStyle 1y ago

💯

CitizenPleb 1y ago

Well I guess that settles asking you the fuck, marry, kill question for onchain, lightning, and ecash.

Scrotus 1y ago

I'm married to lightning, but not nostr