for me it’s about using language that makes the already simple readable protocol implementations even more relatable after using a client. I would look to translations of the nips and try to use the same language.
Discussion
but then I follow my own line of thinking and come up with nip 18 reposts (kind 6 - reposts)
But I might argue this nip is poorly titled because the term “post” doesn’t appear once in nip 01 (kind 1 - Short Text Note), “note” appears three times.
Repost makes way more sense than renote. So is difficult to choose