I have seen several very interesting podcast episodes on this topic.

One was from nostr:nprofile1qqs043gn588da502h36q0sffjay9m69mk28dmm805qtgzl7g6n6q0fgpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctc80655m, the other from the "Chris Fader" podcast on youtube.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Will definitely dive in first to Jake's pod first. He is a sharp chap and I love his pod too. Out of curiosity from the other pods you heard, did they give any sound reasons for this?

Their key point is, that the whole branch of virology is based on a wrong assumption. There is contagion from humans to each other, it's just that this doesn't happen because of "viruses".

hey chris. i admit i am not sure here and am trying hard to understand if virology is a appropriate representation of reality

here is the collection of contagion studies i have found from old old publications

https://files.ostermayer.co/contagionstudies.zip

i walked through the viral control group findings here with their project manager

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs92tj3sf6hz2jen8fgh9rekmluyfzae8pqfmz7dv44ky2qtjyngvqhhq8ym