from my experience, they take some for fees, but it is not much. might be a house rake too, not sure.

as far as randomness / provable verification that would be cool to see

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ahhh I see. It says winner takes 99% of pot. How do we know that the winning npubs are not controlled by the house?

True

Looks like one with the most sets in at time of draw wins. Not sure though I just won.

Right. That’s the way it should be(most sats = most odds). The question is how does one verify that instead of just trusting it.

More like an auction than a lottery

Congrats.

Dumb question : I’m wondering how does this get auditable? Perhaps some kind of verifiable hash of a defined (open source)function + timestamp ?

it's an open standard for gambling generally. provable verification is like:

hash(nonce, server seed, client seed, timestamp) ->

get hex digest ->

convert hex to number ->

that is your random number

to verify, given your client seed you set, and server seed revealed (hidden at time of bet), you can hash it yourself and verify the number is the result

but it's tricky how this is implemented because house can just keep trying multiple server seeds until result meets their liking. this is why server seeds should be hash chains or predetermined in advance or something

Quite interesting. Thanks

It’s above my pay grade.