Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Tauri

The end goal is to reduce the risk of blocks getting orphaned, which is the main reason bad actors like MARA shut down services like that. Spam-pools face the same risk if Knots adoption grows. The default 1-sat/vB filter in Core plays a role similar to what would happen if a restrictive datacarriersize filter were enforced by default. In both cases, miners like MARA would likely abandon spam-related services, since the chance of losing an entire block reward far outweighs a few thousand dollars in extra fees from spam transactions. I think it’s becoming obvious for which team Core devs is playing.

Avatar
SatsAndSports 4mo ago

To clarify, without being too ideological: if a block contains transactions that are missing from the mempools of many relays, then the block might propagate more slowly. This increases the risk of the block being orphaned, and so miners have an incentive to include only transactions which are in the mempool (depending on the fees, of course)

Is that right?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Tauri 4mo ago

Correct

Thread collapsed