Avatar
SatsAndSports
12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6
Into bitcoin. Background in maths and software, so hoping to contribute to something open source in this space When I'm not working in the fiat mines, I'm into cycling and camping I'm trying to use White Noise (different npub), but don't have many contacts yet!

You mean the fee issue you described in your recent article?

I just came across that article today. Very helpful, and I'm kicking myself for not coming up with the chaumian ecash solution which makes it more difficult for the WabiSabi coordinator to link inputs and outputs

Could/Should/Does Joinmarket use the chaumian system too?

https://petertodd.org/2025/coinjoin-comparison#round-structure-and-cryptography

How about having URLs that begin with njump: or nostr:

Then we could have apps and browser plugins that handle it according to the user's preferences

I just used Runstr for the first time

A few sets of "diamond pushups", to make push-ups interesting

nostr:nprofile1qqsxzyppa24zdyn5rvfrdw7w54xx420jpw3set8rzmp6j029pzd86rcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcc7hded

nostr:nevent1qqs0mc7dymvn28k05stljvwqjarggquxh3jn7ww9ra36zrj0wwkdzccppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgs8aems8lpd8qgt3x33nxpp0zd77pdmty6xke4vdcs06dyu4gasuxsrqsqqqqqpetzsq2

Here's a photo from a couple of weeks ago

I go up to my shoulders in the water every time. And sometimes I do a little swim also, but not today

It's much easier than you might think! Especially if you do it with a group. And it's a good workout as your body spends a lot of energy keeping warm

Start as I mean to go on this year. More github commits

Does spending eight minutes in icy water in Berlin this morning count as a workout?

The first season isn't great, but second is good

What do you think?

Having spent a few weeks in their 'Fork Talk' group chat, it's clear to me that nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp00qjrgs is deliberately lying. His bots in the group chat kept repeating his nonsense

A minority hashrate soft fork will split the chain. This is what we'll see in September. The majority hashrate will "do nothing", i.e. run the "Taproot" rules that are being run by almost everybody today. BIP110 will, assuming it's gets nonzero minority hashrate, split the chain and therefore we'll have a second token

This is obvious, but Luke pretends otherwise.

Anyway, thanks for making this post as it gives me an opportunity to block more of the bots that rise in response 🙂

https://xcancel.com/LukeDashjr/status/1983145119176945910

Replying to Avatar Sumeet

Does any of you think that Bitcoin was created by NSA after reading this paper/essay from NSA people?

I mean it does talk about PGP Keys, Node, Peers in 1996

https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=aulr

Tagging to get some visibility else almost nobody sees my posts on this platform.

nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wvh8xmmrd9skcqgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46qddtc35 nostr:nprofile1qqsywt6ypu57lxtwj2scdwxnyrl3sry9typcstje65x7rw9a2e5nq8spp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdud7wqja nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdu20w406 nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqnz0fd0 nostr:nprofile1qqsw3znfr6vdnxrujezjrhlkqqjlvpcqx79ys7gcph9mkjjsy7zsgygpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t03svk44 nostr:nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpzamhxue69uhhyumnd3shjtnwdaehgu3wdejhgtcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9uj53kk7 nostr:nprofile1qqsfrjd9ux5hgsg5cmlz6cdwfh5zv2024g8m2t6g9zqf83l8uqm0svspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm4wfex2mn59en8j6gpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxguyuedc

Anyway I’m not selling either way.

The CIA invented Bitcoin,

but lost control of it in the Blocksize War

Why are there two in Zapstore now?

I think you explained this before, but I forget

Replying to Avatar calle

I've been using since September for 99% of my code, but I haven't really researched how to use it. For example, I don't really know what you mean by subagents

So I guess I need to pause hacking (briefly!) and learn how others are using AI

Replying to Avatar ck

Tru.

You're being too simplistic

Shitting on those kinds of companies sounds similar to the way no-coiners shit on Bitcoin

Saylor can borrow money on much better terms than most people can, so it makes sense for people to invest in MSTR

The extreme case of this could be very interesting for game theory, leading to just one notary getting a very large monopoly

Imagine a single notary does a deal with all the big mining pools which together control 90% of hashrate

That notary could advertise: "give me 10 sats and I'll notarise it as 50 sats".

As they control 90% of hashrate, they will on average get 45 sats back from those 50, and hence the real cost to the notary is just 5 sats (on average) compared to the 10 sats that they earn from the creator of the nostr content

With CSV, the delay is just about 15 months, and that's short enough that the big notary is happy to wait

I think the only solution is to really make sure that today's miners don't see any value from the burning, so either notarizing to an OP_RETURN, or use CLTV to send it very far in the future

nostr:nprofile1qqsv8c37kh3aqrcckt60tzxcek79fpjghemphhvssyscdh6xq0tu42gpypmhxue69uhky6t5wdshgtnddakx7mnvv93x2tngdakxg6twvaej7qghwaehxw309a3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctc0g4qea , is this the right npub for Espen?: nostr:nprofile1qqsdx3xlr7k4x0n4kss9mzh26azsdjdjxa7e7gr3gklvck7gxaknj9qppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp08kq57r I think he had the same idea

Enjoyed this video, just trying to understand hash-based signatures.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T9fCCGzwHJc

which I discovered via X:

https://xcancel.com/willcl_ark/status/2003826095989359085

I read this pdf a few days ago, but didn't really get it 😜. But I think can try again and understand it much better thanks to the video above! https://xcancel.com/n1ckler/status/1998407064213704724

Just telling my parents now that I'm into bitcoin. They're more open than I expected

Using cashu.me , I got my mum to pay a few sats to the Lightning Cats, and she loved it

Now trying to get my dad to bet on sports at Predyx. None of our family are into gambling, but it's an easy way to spend a few sats

Happy Cashu-mas everybody

https://lightningcats.io/

predyx.com

I'm using Blossom to host videos, specifically using HLS so the video is split into many segments - of varying bitrate and quality - and so a 'dumb' HTTP file server like Blossom works perfectly

All the complexity - e.g. adaptive bandwidth use - is client-side, but hls.js is an effective library to make it easy to develop

In my use case, I'm developing a 'Cashu payment channel' which allows tiny Bitcoin payments at very high frequency and therefore a streaming video service where you pay per second is a good demo.

(I feel like I may have misunderstood you a bit. What do you mean by 'formatted'?)

https://hlsjs.video-dev.org/demo/

njal.la , by one of the founders of The Pirate Bay

Has VPS hosting too

Not super cheap, but I'm very happy with it

So you're saying that miners would delay the notarization transaction until the height specified in the CLTV, so that they can notarize and redeem in the same block

Yes, they could in theory, and that would allow the cheating that we discussed before. But they're not going to delay the notarization transaction for decades, if we're sending it decades into the future

The end users of the system (I mean the users of nostr clients who are consuming nostr events and want to see which events have burned sats associated with them) are looking for reliable notaries, i.e. notaries that get the notarizing transactions into blocks within hours or days (not years or decades).

The end user's software could easily check that the notarization transaction is mined at least N blocks before whichever height is specified/implied by the CLTV or CSV locks

nostr:nprofile1qqsv2g4wyh4fgdf85qlqk82yflkarlw3uun0vswlqjzu2mqqejd0qzcys3wz3 1A2KCYi3bWnLtrQN2Byty21eUYmG5b8Xbz

nostr:npub1c532uf02js6j0gp7pvw5gnld687areex7eqa7py9c4kqpny67q9suc56u0 1DLeNApsHNNzUMNZJVoXeyEY5sdp8vzx3w

Does your Cashu mint (fully) support P2PK, e.g. with SIGALL? A simple tool to run some checks against mints.

A few links below:

- youtube demo video

- a link to the tool

- github. It's just a static page, hosted on Github Pages, easy for anyone to clone [and edit] and host. It uses some CDK functionality, so you'll see the repo is a CDK repo with this extra stuff in /web/nut-10-checker

( nostr:npub1zzt0d0s2f4lsanpd7nkjep5r79p7ljq7aw37eek64hf0ef6v0mxqgwljrv nostr:npub16vzjeglr653mrmyqvu0trwaq29az753wr9th3hyrm5p63kz2zu8qzumhgd

nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg

)

https://youtu.be/w3QJWiXBTas

https://satsandsports.github.io/nut-10-checker/web/nut-10-checker/

https://github.com/SatsAndSports/nut-10-checker/tree/nut-10-checker/web/nut-10-checker

This DVM stopped working a couple of weeks ago. I pay it a few sats, but I can't see the results. It worked fine for a few weeks, but stopped recently

If I exit and return, it just asks me to pay again

nostr:nprofile1qqsr25ux06fhdstpzdnmttgy3rtapd4lc072yqgzstxqm3rxdkjw07cpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yerkd5hxxmmd9uq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvtc0dv5ln

Anyone else see this video title and think it was about the cost of a #Bitcoin blockchain reorg? 🙂

https://youtu.be/onr80iOoEXs