What a brilliant analogy this was! I totally agree with you that when you look at the "rare side effects" from a bird's eye view they are actually more common than we realize, more so because a lot of the side effects aren't even recognized or classified as side effects. You can get myocarditis from the clot shot, but the process of that injury being recognized as a jab injury by the system is soo brutally intense that most give up trying to log these injuries, so a lot of them go undetected. Another way to look at it is that, prior to the clot shot roll out, we didn't have as much prevalence of myocarditis in young people or cancers in toddlers; therefore why is it now becoming more common? Isn't that the opposite of rare?