Replying to Avatar arkinox

I am against digital ID, obviously, but I also have an American social security number I was assigned at birth and I could not get a typical job witbout it. So I'm not sure why everyone is especially distressed at this new flavor of government abuse, because digital ids have been a thing since before most of us were born. Is it wrong? Not inherently, but it makes government abuse and identity theft so easy that it constitutes willful negligence of the duty to protect.
Avatar
FreedomTech 3mo ago

It's not the digital part that concerns people. It is the surveillance and unlimited data collection that comes with the new digital IDs.

We need to call these new IDs what they are. Digital Surveillance IDs.

IDs have always been restricted to a few bits of info being attached to them. In order for the government to collect more data, you had to be convicted of a crime.

The new digital IDs are actually surveillance IDs that collect unlimited data on citizens, treating everyone like a convicted criminal.

And the end goal appears to be controlling and forcing people into complying with the immoral dictates of globalist tyrants.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Satosha 3mo ago

#Bitcoin and #nostr don't even need to protect against surveillance..because every thing is OPEN Public 😭 ..

Avatar
FreedomTech 3mo ago

Your identity and biometrics aren't attached to them, and they can't control you through them.

Nostr = identity without identification

Avatar
Satosha 3mo ago

if you bought on Coinbase and likes ..you are already linked .. which is like 90 percent of all BTC txns .. and those who live in wilderness ..chain analytics can get pretty close .. so ..

But I am not saying it is bad .. Bitcoin is supposed to be public OPEN .. there is nothing to hide on this network