Replying to Avatar Dikaios1517

It is very difficult to keep track of, but even so, it is built around this firm consensus:

"For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures... And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins." 1 Corinthians 15:3,4, & 17
Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

Yeah, there's a core protocol and n number of implementations.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

pablo wants to move it to a wikifreedia

i also want it to go this way, think we are nearly ready to jump to self hosted

Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

I had that idea months ago. The problem is keeping the numbering coherent. Or we need to move away from NIP numbering, since it's actually a name and not an integer ID.

Avatar
Dikaios1517 1y ago

Now, where things really get spicy is when various "implementations" start flirting with doctrines that have massive implications on that core protocol, and it can become difficult to tell if they are actually maintaining consensus or forking off into another faith entirely.

Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

Yeah, confusing hard forks are confusing.