Duncan - as a non-technical person my concern is that e-cash, if it becomes too successful, could weaken the core appeal of Bitcoin i.e. its fixed supply.

I did a quick bit of research and found that Calle has already discussed this in a Citadel Dispatch (25 minutes and onwards). Some notes:

Slow-rug risk: printing e-cash which is not 100% backed by Bitcoin.

Some solutions (not yet perfected, but being worked on):

- proof of liability databases

- automated bank-runs

- integration with a federation so the user is not trusting a single e-cash operator

{Note: I post what I find interesting at a particular moment in time.}

note1m6tjj928vj0gmxgjtq2qplf944qwjpg78xrdqawct6szwkmcuurqmq7x7q

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, custodial solutions all carry some risk of debasement. That's why it's important to make them publicly auditable. Good news is we know how to do it now!

If you want to learn more about it: https://gist.github.com/callebtc/ed5228d1d8cbaade0104db5d1cf63939