You’re skipping over the most important part: genetics

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can you prove to me that the environment and society have no influence on humans and that only the biological part determines this

???

I said genetics are the most important part, not the only part.

But answer my multiple questions earlier, and you have your answer to the genetic component.

See, he understands jack shit about the topic.

Me or him?

That trash racoon

Typical Marxist scum

They don’t think, just regurgitate disinformation and then get shocked and angered when corrected, or even simply when you ask them to think

We are making some progress, at least you admit that the environment and society influence individuals, we are making some progress

You’re using garbage information.

Genetics are the most important, followed by the other factors

Internet sources are all biased by mainstream narrative of multiculturalism. That have been seen many time to delete and hide all the data that wasn't showing their idea of the world. If S.Francisco they don't show mugshots because it cause racism. It doesn't cause racism is the proof that in the same environment with the same opportunities some groups show a disproportionate criminal behaviour

The trash panda doesn’t understand anything, he simply regurgitates what he’s told

“Source: I asked an AI”

You know I just cited two scientific studies, right ???

“Scientific.”

They’re science in the way Covid science was science.

As in, not at all.

False equivalence fallacy, read the study and prove it wrong without using fallacies

No, it’s a fallacy to show bullshit “studies” that confirm their own hypothesis.

That’s propaganda, not science.

You haven't even read the first paragraph and you say it's useless ??? We've already paid too much attention to ourselves these days. Enjoy Nostr.

Good luck with your race propaganda.

One of your sources’ authors wrote a book that can be summed up like this

The Anatomy of Violence by Adrian Raine explores the biological roots of violent behavior, arguing that certain people may be predisposed to crime due to brain abnormalities, genetics, and early environmental influences. Drawing from neuroscience, psychology, and criminology, Raine presents evidence that factors like reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex, poor nutrition, and childhood neglect can increase the likelihood of antisocial behavior. He examines controversial ideas about the relationship between biology and free will, and suggests that understanding these biological underpinnings could improve prevention, rehabilitation, and even criminal justice policy. The book challenges readers to reconsider the causes of crime beyond purely social or moral explanations.

So even he disagrees with your premise.

Wow, you spent the time.

I’d say nice, but the trash panda is so retarded I’ve give up.

But nice job.

My source is not the author, but the studies I cited. I don't know why you are talking to me about a document I haven't cited, but anyway, here we go again and I'll finish so as not to fall into the vicious circle that this is: literally the first study cited tells you about biological risk and emphasizes that most of the risk is associated with adverse environmental factors (child abuse, poverty, substance abuse, etc.

Enjoy Nostr 🫡

That’s all wrong and it’s incredibly easy to see how genetics are the main factor.

Nationally, 8 of every 1,000 children were victims of substantiated abuse or neglect in 2022 (~559,000 cases) .

• Data on racial breakdowns are less uniform and vary by state, but systemic bias is documented—Black children are more likely to be reported or suspected of abuse, with racial disparities noted in medical reporting .

National (2023, U.S. Census / other sources):

• Overall poverty rate: 11.1% 

• By race:

• Black: ~17.9% (historical low of ~17.1% in 2022; child poverty ~22.3%) 

• Hispanic: ~14.9%

• Native American / Alaskan Native: ~23% 

• White (non‑Hispanic): ~7.7%

Substance Use Disorders

• 1. Native American/Alaskan Native: ~15%

• 2. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander: ~11.3%

• 3. Multiracial: ~10.9%

• 4. Hispanic & White: ~8–8.6%

• 5. Black: ~7.4%

• 5. Asian: ~4.6%

AM is a retard, so he won’t understand the thread here, but posting for nostr:npub1629s02qzhmlk9dpntpv8z0r6jq78wd9rd8cz7cvjhc72l4rvqr5qj2tz6x and others who’ve been following along.

Nurture matters for some, genetics matters most of all.

https://x.com/notcomplex_/status/1933296049155723527

Stop bringing all to the extreme black and white. Of course economic level, cultural level, and even health are part of the transformation of a person. Then there is also free will so everybody is totally responsible for their actions but as nobody expect a child to be as responsible as an adult and a women to behave like a men so we don't expect an African to behave lake a Finnish

Except the western lie is that blacks act like Finnish, when they’re genetically inferior and act like the savages they are

They don't want to discuss genetics and they don't want to admit that saying that some genetic groups are more violent than others doesn't mean that every one of them is violent but that a violent behaviour is more expected by those groups and this is clearly visible by all statistics. That doesn't mean to be white supremacists or neo nazis as they would like to labels everybody that had a brain to think and eyes to see. The reality is that one dark skin person could be a very good person but every single society with a majority of them turns to shit.

Nazis being the bad guy was a massive lie pushed by the jews, all so the west would support jewish bolshevism and support their horrid country israel.

I know I had friends that were real SS and they were great people

Seems implausible

No it's not. They were just 45-50 years older than me

I come from the world before this one. Weird but I feel quite young. I am one of the damn gen.