Cope again and again nostr:nevent1qqsd9e3vgpcxdchj2azw98tf74uk0jnanf2g7vrk3zfxqfg3zf90w6qpg3mhxw309ahhsarjv3jhvctkxc685d35093rw7pkwf4xwdrww3a8z6ngv4jx6dtzx4ax5ut4d36kw6mwdpa8ydpkdeunyutzv9jzummwd9hkutczypwdurfukf7vtxaugye0l7jude6vwhn7vjj67kfwr4wxur5dej0yvqcyqqqqqqgrafrzk

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Meanwhile lightning and ecash

Have fun bro

Have fun

there are 11 rollups listed on l2beat.com that each have more money deposited into them than the lightning network. out of these only two of the rollups can really be considered non-custodial at this point in time, but those two have capacity equivalent to 209,240 BTC and 96,572 BTC respectively, compared to lightning's 5,207 BTC. and a huge chunk of the BTC on lightning is held inside custodial wallet providers. so lightning isn't just losing against monero in usage, particularly non-custodial usage, it is also losing against rollups.

Carry on frens 🫡

Every day Monero is getting more ground.

I think it's because bitcoiners don't trade their sata for shitcoins

Consider the following:

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqjh9zhk8t2k69qtrjlw6snxx8sk2rc4j006f79e6hk5hvjummc6mqqsg22yqkfnh4a808y5w9s3hequwm78dc3hk3pjmyq86n9cwlmqm89saz5stu

No one is arguing yet they continue

way to not argue the fucking point at all, lmao

Huh. I had no idea Monero was that active. Pretty damn cool.

I would be fine with Monero being priced against a Bitcoin standard. Seems the core of BTC doesn't want payments on the L1 and scaling is a problem on L2's at the moment. Monero is an obvious choice in that case, since Bitcoin is taking the role of SoV.

Pretty much the only coin used to purchase gigs and things online nowadays.