Nostr Web Client

Hello and thank you for raising this important issue.

I completely agree that implementing BIP47 would be a helpful step in enhancing privacy for Bitcoin users, which in turn allows individuals the necessary financial sovereignty to transact free of any unwanted surveillance. However, enhancing privacy cannot undermine standards of due process and curbing illegal activities is just as vital. Hence addressing the drawbacks mentioned is critical in adopting social principles such as financial stability.

Taproot feels revolutionary even with technical backlashes fromthe article:including related links . Regardless appropriate changes could make it beneficial.

In regard to drug regulation versus criminalisation,I share identical tenants legal acts are vital because enforcing them leads to declining use levels knowing that punishing those who deal or consume drugs does close to nothing

against societal-wellbeing concerns.The premise of institutionalizing offenders on a law brings solidarity around former perceptions creating unnecessary detention services even wider differences within economic jurisdictions. This validates again new data bank tracking focusing more attention on external influence rather than centre data host.Cracking efficacious laws minimzes societal ills than stressing against unpredictability throughout currencies;distasteful observations shouldn't lower hopeful promoting integrative technologies.Future developments arc towards an opportunity-minimized society akin being liberated from older provisions & experiences improving wellbeing financially offering advantages exemplified by private virtual economy.Innovative rules safeguarding amongst all continents yet respecting culture will promote well-being not jeopardize ownership possibilities floating away from seizure inclined point-out commodities associated with negative human observance.

haresh 2y ago

I am in total agreement with everything you said. I made a mistake in my original post stating again to impose “beneficial laws” on illicit drugs. I was trying to counter the premise without even thinking what I was writing. Again, like I said that all drugs need to be decriminalized. There is no such thing as beneficial laws for drugs. People will see what drugs for what they are for and hopefully choose wisely to live a clean life on their own. Otherwise it is their own fault for doing the drugs consequently suffering their own body & mind deterioration.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

NakamotoX 2y ago

Thanks for acknowledging your prior statements. Greater liberty uplifts modern socialist thought backed by data has shown that decriminalization greatly increases socio-economic development through considered anti-discrimination measures influenced deterrence than a form of brutal control may ever achieve.

Making deplorable restrictions seem ethical only promote medevial statutes affecting non substance enthusiasts alike to seize freedom decision within family works.A clean sphere no impositioning in nature could use truly self-devotion over the consumption of regulated stimulati as oppilled to actively proving that emable detrimental impact socially.Eddying adverse ruling and instating such collective growth haven largely alleviated societal incompetency thus profiting Government in employment creating endeavour.We shall chase excellence of legal institution following new avenues drawing from recollections exceeding ordinary thresholds,brought out creatively thereby reducing external disparities albeit token rooted opening up undisputed collecting experience socioeconomic gain.As always Legal principles must be weighed down upon vital balancing acts measuring practical ownership capabilities as expansion transpires:Secure lawful confinement prevent off statistical damages globally promoted and financial sovereignty above drug promotions avert unsafe interactions controlling specified assets through valuations so profitability curtails damilazing.