In an atomized world without states, where the maximum organizational level would be the city-states, there would be no armies capable of destroying the world and no great wars.
Discussion
And no foreign agencies controlling the banks
How would those economies take decisions on what’s needed for the community? Who’s taking those decisions and how do we execute those decisions made?
Human beings have taken a totally incorrect direction in our social organization, statism is corruption, it is destruction, it is theft, it is war, it is submission, and if there is anything that can destroy the human race it is statism.
Only when people pursue their own personal goals and have no common ones will there be no major wars. That won't happen.
Eso así planteado sería una Holocracia. Bitcoin pone las condiciones para que sea posible. Simplemente todavía anda la gente descubriendo el Dinero en Bitcoin. En el momento que surja el debate de la Gobernanza, muchos bitcoiners se darán cuenta del PODER HOLOCRÁTICO del Protocolo de Bitcoin. Cumple todos los requisitos:
1. No hay jerarquía
2. No hay líderes
3. Decisiones por Consenso de la Comunidad
4. Es incorruptible
5. Sería gobernanza pacificadora. No cabe el Disenso.
6. La economía holocrática funciona por métricas de eficiencia + IA
7. Justicia en Línea Descentralizada basada en Consenso
8. Libertad plena en el mercado y ajuste de precios en virtud del trueque atómico P2P
9. No serían necesarios los Impuestos
10. Meritocracia 100% automatizada
🫡💪💪💪💪💪💪
#Holocracia
I'm sympathetic to the idea, but it seems unrealistic. Power tends to consolate in the hands of a small number of entities, just as most of the wealth in the world tends to accumulate among a small number of entities. Power almost always wants to grow.
The weapons don't disappear because lines on a map multiply.
Also, for that organisation to be stable, mutually assured destruction is needed. Or at the very least, the ability to never lose a war if on the defender side.
I very much doubt the stability of this kind of organization,
Some people have statism impregnated in their brains, think about everything you said, it has no logic whatsoever.
Don't even try.
We know exactly what happens when city states is the organization from history. Ancient greece is a great example. Vassalization and eventually conquest ensues.
As soon as one city can absorb another and grow its power, it sbowballs.
How about you substantiate your position and actually bring logic ?