Agreed but that wasn't the point of the original post. Just because something exists does not mean it's good and doesn't endanger someone else's liberty and happiness. Look what happened during covaids.
Discussion
Agree đź’Ż not much to add.
Definitions I guess can be interpreted all different ways. I don't mind leaders or governence. However it's not working at the moment.
There will always be normies that need leadership. That is for certain.
You were obviously implying that if people stopped “believing” government is “good” then it would cease to exist and your safety would no longer be at risk.
This is stupid because governments aren’t created because people believe they are good. It’s an emergent property of civilization.
I assume you don’t have an objective moral framework anchored in God, so your use of good is purely subjective. Who’s to say your opinion on what is good is any more valid than anyone else’s. Someone can just as easily say that your belief government is either bad or unnecessary is putting their safety at risk. Both opinions equally as ignorant.