No a lot of bitcoiners (including myself) have realized that in past few months that you are CORECUCK hence I started calling out and surprisingly some people (on Nostr) seem to agree with the statement.

Why don't you just start calling out shitcoin core and shitcoin core devs instead of arguing with me? That would be helpful to you (& bitcoin as well)

And never try to compare funding to shitcoin core with other projects you or Ten31 or OpenSats funded.

You can't compare anything else to shitcoin core because pretty much everything you funded is downstream of shitcoin core so, funding shitcoin core and shitcoin core devs damage more than anything else at this point.

I just hope shitcoin core gets obliterated in the future so, I don't need to tell you CORECUCK anymore.

You started misguiding again without going into nuances.

Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent.

On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here.

I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice.

The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't.

I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.

Treasury companies were this cycle’s shit coins. Fwiw I want the treasury companies to do well

The amount of fiat being tossed at this is crazy.

As both responsibilities are hard as fuck.

Genesis 3:16

To the woman he said,

“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;

with painful labor you will give birth to children.

Your desire will be for your husband,

and he will rule over you.”

Genesis 3:17–19

To Adam he said,

“Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree

about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’

cursed is the ground because of you;

through painful toil you will eat food from it

all the days of your life.

It will produce thorns and thistles for you,

and you will eat the plants of the field.

By the sweat of your brow

you will eat your food

until you return to the ground,

since from it you were taken;

for dust you are

and to dust you will return.”

That makes a lot of sense

Every metaphor is flawed or it would be a direct reference to the original object, otherwise known as a synonym. Is this sophistry?

Many people want Bitcoin to remain a decentralized monetary network without potentially damaging features meant to meet use case desires of companies who want to use Bitcoin for broader applications. There, no metaphors needed.

Did AI get nerfed? LLMs seem to be getting worse than they were a couple of months ago.

Stop complaining like a little princess and sell your BTC then 😜

So the only value Bitcoin has for you is the fiat number gains. Yikes.

Decentralised consensus is the performance. What implementation underpins those fleeting gains, and is it truly free?

If it's not decentralized, it can be seized or frozen just like with a bank. Very few shitcoins have decentralization.

It has an infinite supply cap, just like fiat.

You should read The Bitcoin Standard by Saifedean Ammous

You aren’t understanding that binance can manipulate their token as much as they want- up to a point. Looks like they’ve done a good job. Obviously it pays to run the world’s largest crypto gambling casino- preying on fiat slaves with the false promise of freedom.

If you think that means that BNB is anything other than centralized, predatory shitcoin then you should sell all your btc for bnb.

Unfollowed 👍

Retards everywhere

Temporary fad. With time they will find Bitcoin.

Mandibles. You’re living it.

The gospel message itself, and the Scriptures themselves.

That's the meaning of Matthew 16:18.

Peter is the pebble--the message is the rock.

Hence my point, iPhone 17 is shit

Picture this scenario: Core and Knots chose not to relay large op_returns. Meanwhile, the biggest KYC miners controlling around 90% of hash rate and don't gf about reputation put up an API for pricing and direct submission of transactions - fast and centralized. They mine the transactions into blocks and send them out to core and knots. Core and knots, not seeing a complete mempool, now have broken pricing, and wallets start connecting to the miners' API for better UX, because they're fast (centralized) and have more accurate market pricing of sats/vb.

so you’re telling me MSTR fucked this market up with the same kind of poisonous arbitrage GBTC did 4 years ago?

Your argument rests on it being a legal liability to have CP on your node. Are you saying that SOME cp is OK and defensible but a lot of it is not Ok and indefensible?

Seems to me that it’s black or white. Either you have it on your node or not. And if that’s the case, then bitcoin is vulnerable to just a single instance.

> They already bypass the mempool with services like slipstream and others.

Exactly.

The OP is simply pointing out that actors who are not concerned with cost (like nation states) but are motivated to destroy bitcoin will go to any length necessary to get their shit into a block, which will be stored on every node that doesn’t prune, Knots, Core, or otherwise.

Simulation hypothesis is deeply flawed and arguably satanic in its logic. A simulation has no cost, no anchor, no commitment. It treats reality as something that can be copied, rewound, or double-spent.

Bitcoin shows us the opposite. The “longest chain” hypothesis commits to a singular chain of events, rooted in proof-of-work, and most importantly a verifiable Genesis. Every joule spent is conserved as memory. Every block seals entropy into irreversible structure. There is no rewind, no parallel track, no hidden fork of convenience.

The distinction between simulation and computation is critical. Computation commits and simulation pretends.

Modern mathematics and physics often fall into the same trap. By appending infinity as a placeholder, they open the door to unbounded speculation. Infinity has never been observed. It is intellectually lazy, a way to avoid the hard truth of scarcity. Worse, it is incoherent, because it allows for infinite theories without grounding in the finite reality we actually experience. It’s the infinite double spend.

Bitcoin reveals the principle: all real systems MUST be bound by absolute scarcity. Without commitment, there is no truth. Without scarcity, there is no meaning. Simulation is a double spend. Computation is the chain.

1/∞=0 is the mathematical representation of meaninglessness.

When you start pulling in the threads of QT/QM there are jarring holes in the theory, specifically regarding Superpostion and measurement. Bitcoin stands in direct defiance to the modern interpretation of QT/QM and corrects it in subtle ways. Without going too deep, you can logically land on both a creator and thermodynamically sound theology in line with Christian literature.

Science and religion are tools of understanding, not separate belief structures. Without absolute scarcity, you have no proof for theology, only faith and internal experience. Absolute scarcity provides said proof physically.

IMO the answer is clear, but the work of understanding has yet to be completed.

Every byte of Bitcoin is about economic incentives.

Code is a means to an end, not the other way around.

Luke is literally a deranged Zionist. Who is jewing who here?

> You can’t do anything after it’s added to the chain

Yeah, no shit. So are you planning to host it in blocks on your node?

Or are you going to advocate for a fork? Otherwise this is purely performative.

Yes, you can see it hits his body first and ricochets into neck

Flat Earth?

It doesn’t make sense for Israel to take out Charlie for offering very mild and tepid pushback on them.