Exactly, so why make it easier to spam the chain and blow up the datacarrier size? Which of course will lead to contiguous blobs of CSAM stored on the chain.
“Some robbers can pick locks and jump fences, so let’s get read of them”
Why are you okay with this? The reasons given such as better propagation and fee estimation are marginal and not worth the known and unknown risks.
Do you believe it is currently impossible to get an OP_RETURN larger than 80 bytes added to the chain?
If you pay a miner off chain
So, not impossible and actively happening, but you use language as if it is something currently not possible. I would support a change which would make it impossible.
I never said it was impossible. Go neat pick and make assumptions on someone else’s notes
Get out! Ha! You were accusing OP of being okay with something when he never said such a thing. "Why are you okay with this." smh.
I'm just trying to figure out what set of facts you are using. Apparently it's just emotion.
