its actual gene therapy sold as a vaccine. They bypassed all the usual safety guardrails for gene therapy by convincing everybody it was a normal vaccine, and it was a pandemic so they geot their emergency use authoristion necessary to push this platform through, because there were strong motivations by industry leaders and political think tanks to move a whole range of medical products into this new mRNA paradigm.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's really a horror show how they are now trying to apply this platform to a whole host of stuff, based on lies that the mRNA covid vaccines were such a "success".

It needs to be stopped!

The idea is cool that you can essentially insert any snippets of code into a package, but it has to be done using the proper guardrails and clinical trials.

Yes, we have to have a return to scientific discourse rather than the closed echo chamber of the last few years. This divisive nonsense hurts everyone, and will hold back mRNA drugs in the long run if there are large numbers of adverse reactions.

It's always been known to be dangerous because of dual-use, ie. used for bioweapons research. If there is a great filter, I believe playing god is one of them.

"The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) released a report titled Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology in 2018. Beyond focusing on pathogens and biochemicals, this report discussed how nefarious actors may use technical advances in delivering genetic information like messenger RNA (mRNA) to generate a new class of biological weapons: weapons that modify human cell protein expression. In the case of weaponizing mRNA, the report concluded that there are significant challenges β€œto determining the right targets or edits, packaging the genetic cargo into viral vectors, and delivering it to appropriate host cells.”

https://councilonstrategicrisks.org/2020/12/14/accelerated-advances-in-biotech-and-the-bioweapons-threat/