I tried reading it, I got about half way.

For me, he is so full of vitriol that it is difficult to read.

We Bitcoiners don't fully admit the valid argument on the big blockers side and big blockers don't admit the arguments on our side.

Sadly, the winner gets to write history and so we don't acknowledge the valid reasons why you might want big blocks.

The TL;DR for me is everyone wants big blocks, but if you adopt them to scale for Bitcoin adoption, eventually it only becomes possible for large centralised companies to run a node. At that point you are trusting a corporation, which is what we do with fiat right now and it becomes extremely possible for a government to shutdown or censor a company. It's why Napster failed, but BitTorrent won.

You should definitely try to read it, but also the Blocksize War by Jonathan Bier which gives a very balanced overview of that time.