Okay I still have “buts”:

- aggression would still not be legitimate, as the aggressor would be punished non the less (regardless if he finds eve fence or not

- information (here the evidence) is not scare? and thus no property.

- if the evidence would be uploaded to the internet, third parties would have gotten the information without aggression, and it could then be used legally

Also it feels wrong, but I now feelings are not objectively. But it’s basically saying, the truth does not exist legally.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.